Overpopulation myth

I realize I've not updated in a few months but I'm back with more to say. Although honestly, I always have something to say. I just don't always write.

As the title suggests, the concern for overpopulation is what I shall be briefly address. Now for starters, overpopulation is not even true, and I shall provide a link or two to prove it. But say it were true, why do we spend money trying to find ways of keeping people alive longer? Shouldn't we let them die? I mean, if overpopulation is true, we would let everyone die, no medical interference, no research trying to advance life spans.

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/05/29/overpopulation-is-a-myth-plenty-of-food-and-space-exists/

http://www.albalagh.net/population/overpopulation.shtml

fact not opinion video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x542DALvFos&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Abortion: only a women issue?

No, abortion also concerns men. They have a responsibility to speak out against abortion because real men don't stand by with their hands in their pockets while the unborn are being killed. Men against abortion have every right to speak against it and those who tell them to shut up need to stay consistent and tell the ones who are for it to shut up also. After all, if it doesn't concern men why should they say it's ok to kill the unborn?

The pro-choice side is so quick to tell prolife men to shut it yet again, they're inconsistent. They also didn't mind that in 1973 when Roe. v. Wade was decided upon all members were male- but wait, they shouldn't have a voice in the matter! Yet they were the ones who legalized abortion.

Again, most abortionists are men. Many men force women into abortion. So evidently the only men the prochoice side wants silenced are the men who believe women can do better than abortion.

And lastly, if the argument is men cannot get pregnant therefore shouldn't have a voice in it, what about the women who can't get pregnant? Should only fertile women be allowed to have an opinion?

Abby Johnson

I feel like it should be said that Abby Johnson should not be hated or looked down on. No she's not perfect but are you or I? Yea didn't think so. She worked for an abortion clinic, yes, and because of that I'm always hearing horrible things about her. Yes, she worked there. But ya know what? she's pro-life now, one of us! She worked against us at one point in her life and regrets it, but she can'...t change it and neither will hatred; hatred does nothing good.

It is also said "too bad she didn't change sooner." Lets look at the positive- she changed! God was working on her, and we as humans are very weak sometimes, not strong enough to do the right thing and ignore Him.

Y'all remember Paul? yeah he was Saul, killer of Christians. He switched sides (like Abby). Jesus forgave him, and Paul did great things. Yes, if he had changed sooner more Christians woulda lived, but the thing is he repented and turned from his sinful, wicked ways. He did great things!

Abby can't change her past, the things she did and neither could Paul. But God gave both His mercy, grace and love. Let us extend the same to her. She is fighting for life just as strongly if not more so than she did for abortion.

Let us love one another, let us be pro-life and not merely anti-abortion

human or not human

When a woman is pregnant obviously it's an unborn baby. But pro-choicers call it a fetus (although if you look it up fetus is Latin for little child or something along those lines). And it seriously bugs me crazy much when someone says "it's not a human."


Not a human? Then what the heck is she carrying in there, an alien? A pregnant dog is pregnant with puppies, a pregnant cat with kittens, and you know what I'm getting at. A human is only pregnant with a little human, a baby. It is alive, with his or her own set of DNA. His or her heart is already beating by the time most women discover they're pregnant.


I thought the argument was for person hood, not if it's human or not. But I guess if it's not human, then there is no argument if it gets person hood status or not.


People beget people, dogs beget dogs, praying mantises beget praying mantises. One doesn't deny that creatures (every living thing I mean by that) are pregnant with what they are yet one will deny a woman is pregnant with a little human. They say it's nothing but a mass of cells. We are all a bunch of cells, does it make you or I any less human? Yeah, didn't think so.


They say the unborn fetus has potential to become a human or person, it has the blueprint, like an acorn seed has the potential, blueprint to become an acorn tree. There is a difference, because by 8 weeks in a pregnancy the unborn fetus has everything like the rest of us and from then on it is just developing more. An acorn seed isn't a baby tree, but the unborn? Is a baby person.


So no, the unborn baby isn't just a potential human or person or whatever they call it, it is a human, it is a person.